NEWS-PRESS

April 16, 2007

 

Environmentalists decry coal plant

Forum addresses fears with plans near Lake O, other water issues

 

By Amy Sowder

asowder@news-press.com

 

http://www.news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007704160342

As rain drenched Fort Myers on Sunday, more than 80 people attended a forum on water quality at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Fort Myers, just off Daniels Parkway.

 

One hot topic from the four key speakers was the impact of the proposed $5.7 billion coal-burning plant to be located near Lake Okeechobee.

 

The state public service commission is expected to hold hearings today and Tuesday about the need for the Florida Power & Light plant on 5,000 acres of sugar-cane fields northwest of Moore Haven.

 

Environmentalists fear the plant will needlessly spew more mercury and toxins into the already-polluted waterways when another fuel source could be used without much more cost.

 

It would be the largest coal-burning plant in the country, projected by FPL to produce 180 pounds of mercury a year, said Susan Glickman, a member of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

 

"They tell you coal is the cheapest, but not necessarily," Glickman said. "The cost of coal is rising, as well as coal transportation and plant construction. Why not look at other energy sources that were said to be too expensive, like solar energy?"

 

The negative consequences of the plant could filter into all aspects of South Florida life, from the health of residents to the tourism industry, she said.

 

"It's eye-opening," said Ian Wymbs, 32, of Cape Coral. "There are so many underlying problems that are being ignored. I really don't think saving the earth should be political."

 

The event was organized by the League of Women Voters of Lee County, and seven environmental groups participated. Also, Fort Myers City Councilman Warren Wright and Lee County Commissioner Tammy Hall were among the crowd.

 

No one from FPL attended the forum, but experts said the company was not specifically to blame. They said the utilities industry as a whole needs to change.

 

Community leaders and residents listened as experts also examined the economic and social impacts of Southwest Florida's failing drainage system and dangerous toxins including red tide, nitrogen and phosphate.

 

The Everglades restoration project — which increased the water flow speed eight times over from Kissimmee on down through Lake Okeechobee — was based on weather conditions that haven't been seen since before 1994, said Paul Gray, a scientist with the Audubon Society of Florida.

 

Farmers and residents either have too much water, or too little because the system drains too fast, he said. The system was based on about 1 foot of water influx, whereas now we see more than 3 feet.

 

"We've got to catch more water, treat it and move it south," Gray said.

 

He suggested updating the drainage system by buying farmland surrounding Lake Okeechobee to use toward that effort and improving the Caloosahatchee estuaries. "Heaven forbid, don't put in more residential development," he said with a smile.

 

If the freshwater overflow can be caught and treated in time before it reaches the Gulf of Mexico, that could help reduce algal blooms, some of which are K. brevis, or red tide, experts said.

 

That sounded like a good idea to May-Wong Chou, 38, of Bonita Springs.

 

Chou said she doesn't go to the beach anymore because she thinks the red tide is causing her allergy problems.

 

"I get more congested, with sneezing and headaches," Chou said. "I lived in this area 20 years ago and didn't experience this."